View source for 5.4.1 RISC vs. CISC

=== 5.4.1 RISC vs. CISC ===
When computer engineers design a CPU's instruction set, they usually follow one of two main philosophies: RISC or CISC. It's like deciding if our robot should have a few very simple commands or many complicated ones.

# '''RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computer):'''
#* '''Idea:''' Think of this like a chef who has many simple, quick tools (like a knife, a spoon, a whisk). Each tool does one basic job very fast. To make a fancy meal, the chef combines many small, fast actions using these simple tools.
#* '''CPU Example:''' RISC CPUs understand a ''small'' number of ''simple'' instructions. Each instruction typically takes only one "cycle" (a tiny tick of the CPU's clock) to complete. To do something complex (like "sort a list of numbers"), the CPU has to use many of these simple instructions in a row.
#* '''Pros:''' They are generally simpler to design, can be very power-efficient (great for phones and tablets!), and can run simple instructions incredibly fast.
#* '''Cons:''' Complex tasks require more instructions overall.
#* '''Common Use:''' You'll find RISC-based CPUs in many smartphones, tablets, and even Apple's newer Mac computers (which use ARM processors, a type of RISC).
# '''CISC (Complex Instruction Set Computer):'''
#* '''Idea:''' This is like a chef who has a few super-fancy, multi-purpose machines (like a food processor that can chop, mix, and puree all with one button press). One machine can do a lot of complicated steps with a single command.
#* '''CPU Example:''' CISC CPUs understand a ''large'' number of ''complex'' instructions. A single CISC instruction can do several things at once (like "load a number, add it to another, and store the result" all in one go). These complex instructions might take several CPU cycles to complete.
#* '''Pros:''' Fewer instructions are needed for complex tasks, which can sometimes make programming at a very low level a bit easier.
#* '''Cons:''' They are more complicated to design, can use more power, and sometimes the CPU might not use all parts of a complex instruction if it only needs part of it.
#* '''Common Use:''' Most traditional desktop and laptop computers (like those using Intel or AMD processors) have CISC-based CPUs.

In reality, modern CPUs often combine ideas from both RISC and CISC to get the best of both worlds, using smart tricks to make even complex instructions run quickly. But the basic ideas of simple, fast commands (RISC) versus complex, powerful commands (CISC) still help us understand how different CPUs are designed.

=== Bibliography for 5.4.1 RISC vs. CISC ===

* '''RISC vs. CISC Comparison:'''
** GeeksforGeeks. "Difference between RISC and CISC Architecture." ''GeeksforGeeks.org'', <nowiki>https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/difference-between-risc-and-cisc-architecture/</nowiki> (Accessed July 8, 2025)
** IBM. "What's the difference between CISC and RISC architectures?" ''IBM.com'', <nowiki>https://www.ibm.com/blogs/research/2021/04/cisc-risc-architectures/</nowiki> (Accessed July 8, 2025)
* '''RISC Architecture:'''
** TechTarget. "What is RISC (reduced instruction set computer)? - Definition from WhatIs.com." ''TechTarget.com'', <nowiki>https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/RISC-reduced-instruction-set-computer</nowiki> (Accessed July 8, 2025)
* '''CISC Architecture:'''
** TechTarget. "What is CISC (complex instruction set computer)? - Definition from WhatIs.com." ''TechTarget.com'', <nowiki>https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/CISC-complex-instruction-set-computer</nowiki> (Accessed July 8, 2025)